Two companies have been sentenced after a structural engineer received serious crush injuries when a bundle of scaffold tubes weighing about one tonne rolled onto his legs while he was visiting a client’s construction site.
Southwark Crown Court heard how, on 15 September 2015, the engineer, accompanied by two managers at the site in London, approached four bundles of scaffold tube stored on the ground (one of the bundles had been stacked on top of the other three) which had been left unattended. The top bundle was disturbed, rolled off and fell onto the engineer’s lower legs. It took several attempts to free him from under the bundle. The engineer suffered fractures to both ankles and a number of fractures on his right leg.
The scaffold bundles were delivered earlier that day and belonged to a scaffolding firm.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the scaffold company failed to ensure that control measures specified in the company’s risk assessment – material storage area to be fully segregated using physical barriers – were in place to prevent access by unauthorised persons.
The principal contractor had signed off on the scaffold companies storage requirements and should have been conscious of the practical difficulties concerning deliveries and storage due to the confined nature of the site. On the day of the incident, the principal contractor site management had become aware that the scaffold materials had not been segregated, however, no action was taken.
The scaffold company pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 15 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, and has been fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £7,777.99.
The principal contractor pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 13 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and has been fined £130,000 and ordered to pay costs of 7830.79.
After the hearing, HSE inspector Gabriella Dimitrov said: “The contractors knew that it was a congested site with large demolition machines tracking around and as such required careful planning with regards to material arrivals and storage. This incident could have been easily prevented had suitable barriers been provided.”
Source – HSE